Playing as them, their inability to fortify or settle or ambush, and their bonuses from razing and being at war, mean constant battle is pretty much their experience. For Attila, the wealth of a city, the lives of its people, even the fertile land they rode through, were all tools for the huns to accrue more riches.
Factions in the previous game had different units, buildings and appearances, but they all followed the basic civilized elements-they used their provinces for farming, their cities for manufacture, and they didn't attack each other on sight.īy contrast, Attila and his Huns do really embody Total War, in the original meaning from Clausewitz-to mean nothing was civilian, everything was a military target. Attila might not appear to be that different to Rome II, but it’s a somewhat structurally different game, most noticeably in the asymmetry of the factions.
0 kommentar(er)
